skip navigation
Here's how you know US flag signifying that this is a United States Federal Government website

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

SSL

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Press Release

Congressional Campaigns Spend $912 Million Through Late November

January 3, 2005

Press Office

FEC Home Page

For Immediate Release
January 3, 2005
Contact:

Bob Biersack
Ian Stirton
Kelly Huff

George Smaragdis

CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGNS SPEND $912 MILLION THROUGH LATE NOVEMBER

WASHINGTON -- Congressional candidates participating in the November 2, 2004 general election raised $985.4 million and spent $911.8 million, according to a compilation by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) from financial reports covering from January 1, 2003 through November 22, 2004 . These figures represent an increase of 20% in receipts and 18% in spending over the comparable period in 2002.

Candidates in special elections spent an additional $8.2 million in 2003 and 2004, and candidates who lost in primaries reported $197 million in spending through September 30, 2004 . All campaigns will file year-end reports covering the remainder of 2002 at the end of January.

Senate candidates participating in the 2004 general election raised $371.6 million and spent $360.2 million.  These totals each were 32% higher than in 2002.  Comparisons across election cycles are particularly difficult for Senate races because the states involved vary. In addition, a few campaigns can significantly affect totals. For example, in 2004, there were Senate campaigns in several large states that typically are more expensive. California , New York , and Pennsylvania had incumbents seeking reelection, and there were open seat races in Florida and Illinois .

House general election candidate fundraising increased 14% over 2002 levels to a total of $613.8 million. Spending by these candidates totaled $551.7 million, up 10%. This growth is found mainly among Republican candidates whose fundraising increased by 24% since 2002 with spending up by 20%. Fundraising by Democratic House candidates, by contrast, increased by 3%, while their spending rose only 1%. Both the number of open seat candidates and their financial activity declined for Democrats and Republicans in 2004. Tables that follow, however, show that median receipts grew in 2004 for all types of House campaigns except Democratic candidates in open seat races.

Contributions from individuals totaled $613 million and continue to be the largest source of receipts for Congressional candidates, representing 62% of all fundraising as of November 22. PAC contributions totaled $288.6 million or 29%, while candidates themselves contributed or loaned a total of $39.4 million, which was 4% of all receipts. Contributions from individuals grew by 36% when compared with the same time period in the 2002 campaign, while PAC contributions increased by 12% and contributions and loans from candidates themselves were 44% lower than 2002 totals. Campaigns also showed a slightly larger reliance on contributions in excess of $200 from individuals. Those changes were not large, however, in the first election cycle during which the legal limit on individual contributions to candidates was doubled under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA).

  The general pattern of financial activity in 2004 campaigns can also be seen in the overall totals for general election winners:

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Activity of Winning Congressional Candidates

 

 

 

 

 

through Late November of the Election Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate

 

 

 

 

 

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1992

1990

Raised

 

$247.1

$167.5

$243.9

$160.8

$119.8

$145.7

$116.7

$119.9

Spent

 

$237.7

$159.9

$238.6

$155.0

$122.3

$144.2

$120.5

$111.7

Contrib from PACs

 

 

 

$50.6

$40.3

$30.4

$35.1

$27.5

$31.7

$31.7

$30.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

House

 

 

 

 

 

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1992

1990

Raised

 

$491.3

$411.8

$398.2

$322.3

$318.0

$240.6

$228.8

$194.2

Spent

 

$432.5

$374.5

$355.0

$277.3

$287.4

$220.7

$230.7

$171.6

Contrib from PACs

 

 

 

$198.4

$175.6

$163.6

$132.1

$122.9

$97.3

$96.5

$90.8

 

 

 

 

in millions of dollars

 

 

 

 

 

 Apart from spending by campaigns themselves, individuals and groups, including parties and PACs, spent an additional $129.7 million advocating the election or defeat of Congressional candidates through November 22, 2004, without coordinating with the campaigns.  Party committees accounted for 89% of these independent expenditures ($116.1 million).  Independent expenditures in 2002 Congressional races totaled only $18.8 million, of which only $3.7 million were made by parties.  Prior to the passage of BCRA, parties were permitted to use a mix of federal (hard) and nonfederal (soft) money for generic activities, some of which included advertising that referred to federal candidates without advocating their election.  Under BCRA, national parties are prohibited from raising or spending nonfederal funds, and no soft money can be used by parties for federal election activity.  National and state parties are also permitted to make limited expenditures on behalf of general election candidates in coordination with the campaigns.  These expenditures totalled $26.7 million through late November, compared with $20.4 million in coordinated expenditures in 2002.  Tables included here list totals for these expenditures in each Senate or House race where at least $5,000 was spent outside the campaigns.

 Other tables attached to this release (see links below) offer summary data for Senate and House candidates by political party, as well as by candidate status (incumbent, challenger, or open seat). Also included are rankings of Senate and House candidates for the following categories: receipts, individual contributions, PAC and other committee contributions, contributions and loans from the candidate, disbursements, cash-on-hand, and debts owed. Six-year financial summaries of Senate candidates for 2004, as well as current-cycle financial summaries for each House campaign are also attached.

 

 

 



Footnotes

 

  1. Figures in the first two tables and the detailed listings of candidates cover from January 1, 2003 , or whenever the campaign registered during the year, through November 22, 2004 .
  2. Net receipt and net disbursement figures are total receipts and total disbursements, as reported by the campaigns, minus any money transferred between committees of the same campaign.
  3. Columns entitled "Contrib from Other Cmte''''s" are monies contributed to campaigns by PACs and other committees as reported by the campaigns. Other committees consist primarily of committees of other candidates.
  4. On the Senate listings, the column titled "Candidate Support" includes contributions by the candidate as well as loans made or guaranteed by the candidate. The column titled "Trans from Other Auth." Includes moneys transferred from House committees of candidates for the Senate, as well as proceeds from joint fundraising activity among several candidates or committees. Contributions from individuals and PACs made through these joint fundraising efforts are NOT included in the "Individual Contributions" or "Other Cmte Contributions" columns.
  5. Open-seat races are those in which the incumbent did not seek reelection.
  6. Some House members who are or were running for the Senate in 2004 changed their former House campaign committees into their Senate campaign committees. Financial activity related solely to their Senate campaigns cannot be isolated. (See Denise Majette [GA], John Thune [SD] )
  7. Several candidates report significant debts, at least some of which were incurred in previous election cycles. These include;
  •  Darrell Issa (CA)
  •  Erskine Bowles (NC)
  •  Robert Bennett (UT)
  •  James Cooper (TN)
  •  Christopher Chocola (IN)
  •  Rahm Emanuel (IL)
  •  Richard Renzi (AZ)
  •  Robert Beauprez (CO)
  •  Terry Everett ( AL )

8. Party abbreviations in the listing of House campaigns are:

  • DEM - Democrat LIB - Libertarian
  • DFL - Democrat/Farmer/Labor (MN) PAF - Peace and Freedom
  • REP - Republican IND - Independent
  • RTL - Right to Life LBL - Liberal

 


Tables

Files marked [ excel ] can be read using Microsoft Excel available from Microsoft and those marked [ pdf ] can be reader using Acrobat Reader available from Adobe.

  • Financial Activity of 2004 Congressional Campaigns [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Individual Contributions to Congressional Candidates by Size of Contribution [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Financial Activity of Senate Candidates - 1994-2004 [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Independent and Coordinated Expenditures in 2004 Senate General Election Campaigns [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Financial Activity of House Candidates - 1994-2004 [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Independent and Coordinated Expenditures in 2004 HouseGeneral Election Campaigns [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Median Receipts for House Candidates [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Numbers of House nonincumbent Candidates by Fundraising [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Median Spending in Close House Races [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •  Median activity for House nonincumbent winners and their opponents [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  • Six Year Financial Summary for 2004 Senate Campaigns through November 22, 2004 [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  • Senate Top 50''''s
    •  Top 50 Senate Campaigns by Receipts       [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
    •  Top 50 Senate Campaigns by Contributions from Individuals  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
    •  Top 50 Senate Campaigns by Contributions from PACs and Other Committees  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
    •  Senate Campaigns Ranked by Contributions and Loans from the Candidate [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
    • Top 50 Senate Campaigns by Disbursements  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]       
    •  Top 50 Senate Campaigns by Cash on Hand  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]        
    •  Senate Campaign Debts  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  • House Top 50''''s       
    •  Top 50 House Campaigns by Receipts  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
    •  Top 50 House Campaigns by Contributions from Individuals  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
    •  Top 50 House Campaigns by Contributions from PACs and Other Committees  [ excel]   [ pdf ]
    •  Top 50 House Campaigns by Contributions and Loans from the Candidate   [ excel]   [ pdf ]
    • Top 50 House Campaigns by Disbursements  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]      
    •  Top 50 House Campaigns by Cash on Hand  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]        
    •  Top 50 House Campaigns by Debts Owed  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]

    House Incumbent Top 50''''s

  •       Top 50 by Receipts  [ excel]   [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Contributions from Individuals  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Contributions from PACs and Other Committees  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Disbursements  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]      
  •       Top 50 by Cash on Hand  [ excel ]  [ pdf]
  •       Top 50 by Debts Owed  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  • House Challenger Top 50''''s
  •       Top 50 by Receipts  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Contributions from Individuals  [ excel]   [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Contributions from PACs and Other Committees  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Disbursements  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]      
  •       Top 50 by Cash on Hand  [ excel]   [ pdf ]        
  •       Top 50 by Debts Owed  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  • House Open Seat Top 50''''s
  •       Top 50 by Receipts  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Contributions from Individuals  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Contributions from PACs and Other Committees  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]
  •       Top 50 by Disbursements  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]      
  •       Top 50 by Cash on Hand  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]        
  •       Top 50 by Debts Owed  [ excel ]  [ pdf ]

House Campaigns by State and District   [ excel ]  [ pdf ]

###