Commission meetings and hearings
- June 26, 2018: The Commission met in .
- June 27-28, 2018: The Commission held a on a regarding internet communication disclaimers.
- June 28, 2018: The Commission held an .
Advisory opinion issued
On June 28, the Commission approved an advisory opinion in response to a request from Clements for Congress (the Committee), the principal campaign committee of Paul Clements, a 2018 primary candidate for Michigan’s 6th Congressional District. The Commission concluded that it is permissible for the Committee to use campaign funds to pay for legal expenses incurred in seeking to gain access to the ballot in an upcoming congressional election because the expenses would not exist irrespective of the campaign of the candidate. During the discussion, the Commission heard from the candidate.
On June 28, the Commission made public Advisory Opinion Request 2018-10. The requestor asks whether it qualifies as a state political party committee. The Commission must issue a response no later than the first business day following the 60th day after the receipt of the complete request, that is, by August 21, 2018.
. On June 25, the Commission issued the , covering financial activity from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016. The Commission approved a finding that the Committee failed to disclose debts and obligations to 10 vendors totaling $139,524.
The Commission made public five closed cases, as follows. For more information, see the case documents in the .
- COMPLAINANTS: Richard Stubblefield; and FEC-Initiated
- RESPONDENTS: Kyle McCarter for Congress Committee and Kelly Standfield, in her official capacity as treasurer (McCarter Committee); Citizens for Kyle McCarter (State Committee); Rural King Distribution & Management, Inc.; Rural King Distributing; Total Grain Marketing, LLC; Burgdorf and Associates Wealth Managers, Inc.; Tri Ford, Inc.; James W. Best; and Darren Bailey
- SUBJECT: In the normal course of exercising its supervisory responsibilities, and in response to a complaint, the Commission initiated proceedings to determine whether there was reason to believe the McCarter Committee received excessive and prohibited contributions, including general election contributions that were not refunded after Kyle McCarter, a 2016 primary candidate for Illinois’s 15th Congressional District, lost the election, and in-kind contributions from the State Committee, which allegedly paid for consulting services for the federal campaign.
- DISPOSITION: The Commission found reason to believe that the Committee knowingly accepted excessive and prohibited contributions. The Commission also found reason to believe Best made an excessive contribution to the Committee. The Commission entered into conciliation agreements providing for the Committee to pay a civil penalty of $5,300 and Best to pay a civil penalty of $3,700. The Commission exercised its prosecutorial discretion and dismissed the allegation against Bailey. The Commission found no reason to believe that Burgdorf and Associates Wealth Managers, Inc. or Rural King Distributing made prohibited contributions because the contributions at issue were refunded timely. The Commission found no reason to believe Rural King Distribution & Management, Inc. or Total Grain Marketing, LLC made prohibited contributions because the available record indicated that they did not make the contributions at issue. The Commission exercised its prosecutorial discretion and dismissed the allegation of a prohibited contribution with respect to Tri Ford, Inc. The Commission observed that the amount of that contribution was small.
- COMPLAINANT: Edward Cox
- RESPONDENT: New Yorkers Together and Peter Sikora, in his official capacity as treasurer (NYT)
- SUBJECT: The complaint alleged that NYT distributed public communications that expressly advocated against the election of Donald Trump without registering as a political committee with the Commission and without filing required disclosure reports.
- DISPOSITION: The Commission found no reason to believe NYT had engaged in express advocacy for or against a clearly identified federal candidate because there was no exhortation in the communication for any action with regard to Trump, and the only directive contained in the communication, in large, unmistakable letters, was to vote against a nonfederal candidate. Consequently, reasonable minds could differ as to the interpretation of the mailer.
- COMPLAINANT: Tuckerman Babcock
- RESPONDENT: Citizens for Joe Miller and Thomas John Nelson in his official capacity as treasurer (the Committee); Joe Miller; and Restoring Liberty LLC
- SUBJECT: The complaint alleged that the Committee accepted prohibited contributions and failed to include proper disclaimers on solicitations and communications, failed to properly disclose various receipts and expenditures, and fabricated in-kind contributions. Miller was a 2016 candidate for Alaska’s United States Senate seat.
- DISPOSITION: The Commission exercised its prosecutorial discretion and dismissed the complaint. The Commission observed that the campaign in question lasted only eight weeks, the associated costs were likely small, and there was no information indicating the Committee inflated the value of any in-kind contribution in order to reimburse Miller for more than its value.
- COMPLAINANT: Patricia Ann Noonan
- RESPONDENT: Levi for Colorado and Paula Sandoval in her official capacity as treasurer (the Committee); and Levi Tillemann
- SUBJECT: The complaint alleged that Tillemann failed to file required disclosure reports after he became a candidate. Levi Tillemann is a 2018 candidate for Colorado’s 6th Congressional District.
- DISPOSITION: The Commission exercised its prosecutorial discretion and dismissed the complaint. The Commission observed the small amount of activity at issue. The Commission sent a letter cautioning Tillemann and the Committee to take steps to comply with the registration and reporting requirements of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the Act).
- COMPLAINANT: Self-Initiated
- RESPONDENT: Let America Work and Benjamin Ottenhoff in his official capacity as treasurer (the Committee)
- SUBJECT: The Committee notified the Commission that it failed to disclose in a timely manner, through a 24-Hour Report, an independent expenditure of $324,821 in connection with a Senatorial campaign in the 2016 general election.
- DISPOSITION: The Commission found reason to believe the Committee failed to disclose the expenditure timely and entered into a conciliation agreement providing for the Committee to pay a civil penalty of $12,500.
- Committee to Defend the President v. FEC (Case No. 18-cv-00888). On June 22, the Commission filed a in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
- CREW v. FEC (Case No. 18-5136). On June 25, appellees filed a and appellants filed a in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
- CREW, et al. v. FEC (Case No. 18-0076). On June 25, plaintiffs filed a in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Rulemakings and agency procedures
On June 27-28, the Commission heard testimony from 18 experts at a two-day public hearing on the(NPRM) regarding internet communication disclaimers. The Commission is considering proposals for a rulemaking to amend the definition of “public communication” and regulations concerning disclaimers on public communications on the internet that contain express advocacy, solicit contributions, or are made by political committees. The Commission received over 165,800 public comments and signatories to others’ comments on the NPRM, which are available . On June 27, Commissioner Matthew S. Petersen issued a .
- FEC holds hearing on internet communication disclaimers (issued June 28)
- Commission approves advisory opinion (issued June 28)
Upcoming Commission meetings and hearings
- July 17, 2018 The Commission is scheduled to meet in .
- July 19, 2018 The Commission is scheduled to hold an .
Meeting dates are subject to change. Please contact the Press Office the week of the scheduled meeting for confirmation.
Upcoming reporting due dates
- July 15: July Quarterly Reports are due. For more information on quarterly reporting dates, refer to the page of the Commission website.
- July 20: July Monthly Reports are due. For more information on monthly reporting dates, refer to the of the Commission website.
Upcoming Educational Outreach
Additional information is available on theof the Commission website.
Additional research materials
Additional research materials about the agency, campaign finance information, and election results are available through theof the Commission website.
Printed copies of the 2018 edition ofare now available. Contact the Commission's Information Division at (202) 694-1100 or (800) 424-9530 (press 6, when prompted) to order printed copies of the CFR at no charge. You may also email the Information Division to place an order at .
The 2017is available. Other are available, as well.
Thelist is available.
is available. The data was compiled from the official vote totals published by state election offices. To order a printed copy, please contact the FEC’s Public Records Office at 800/424-9530 (option 2) or 202/694-1120, or send an email to .
Theis available. This publication identifies the federal and state agencies responsible for the disclosure of campaign finances, lobbying, personal finances, public financing, candidates on the ballot, election results, spending on state initiatives and other financial filings.
Theis available as a continuously updated online news source.
Join the FEC on Twitter and YouTube
Followon Twitter to receive the latest information on agency updates, news releases, and weekly activity. Subscribe to our YouTube channel, , to watch instructional videos that have been designed to help candidates and committees comply with federal campaign finance laws. Note that the FEC is not currently available through other social media platforms at this time. The use of the agency’s logo, name, and likeness on other mediums has not been authorized by the FEC.