skip navigation
Here's how you know US flag signifying that this is a United States Federal Government website

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

SSL

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Press Release

FEC Completes Action on Two Enforcement Cases

January 9, 2007

For Immediate Release
January 9, 2007
Contact:

Bob Biersack
Kelly Huff
George Smaragdis
Michelle Ryan

FEC COMPLETES ACTION ON TWO ENFORCEMENT CASES

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Election Commission has recently made public action on two matters previously under review (MURs). In MUR 5682, the Commission found no reason to believe the respondents made or received corporate contributions because the Bachmann for Congress committee paid a fee to EdWatch, Inc. for a mailing list and Renee Doyle, the President of EdWatch, acted in her personal capacity when she endorsed the Bachmann campaign.

In MUR 5455, the Commission dismissed the complaint because this matter would require considerable resources to investigate with only very limited prospects for identifying the party that made the calls.

This release contains only disposition information.

1.

MUR 5682

RESPONDENTS:

(a)  Bachmann for Congress, Joe Droogsma, treasurer

(b)  Renee T. Doyle, President, EdWatch, Inc.

(c)   EdWatch, Inc.

COMPLAINANT:

Karl Bremer

SUBJECT:

Corporate contributions

DISPOSITION:

(a-c)  No reason to believe*

          [re: corporate contribution]

The complaint alleged that EdWatch, Inc., a nonprofit corporation made, and Bachman for Congress knowingly received, a prohibited corporate contribution by providing a mailing list to the committee and that Renee Doyle, the President of EdWatch, Inc., endorsed Ms. Bachman’s candidacy. The Commission found no reason to believe the respondents violated the law because the committee paid for the mailing list and Ms. Doyle acted in her personal capacity when she made the endorsement.

DOCUMENTS ON PUBLIC RECORD:

Documents from this matter are available from the

Commission’s web site at http://www.fec.gov by entering

5682 under case numbers in the Enforcement Query System. They are also available in the FEC’s Public Records Office at 999 E St. NW in Washington.

2.

MUR 5455

RESPONDENTS:

Unknown

COMPLAINANT:

Randy Frederick, Chairman, South Dakota Republican Party

SUBJECT:

Disclaimer

DISPOSITION:

Dismiss the matter.

The complainant alleged that telephone calls made to voters throughout the state of South Dakota in May of 2004 that targeted then-Congressional candidate Larry Diedrich and his record as a state senator had no disclaimer or other attribution to any entity, political committee or individual.

DOCUMENTS ON PUBLIC RECORD:

Documents from this matter are available from the

Commission’s web site at http://www.fec.gov by entering

5455 under case numbers in the Enforcement Query System. They are also available in the FEC’s Public Records Office at 999 E St. NW in Washington.

 

There are four administrative stages to the FEC enforcement process:

1. Receipt of proper complaint

3. “Probable cause” stage

2. “Reason to believe” stage

4. Conciliation stage

It requires the votes of at least four of the six Commissioners to take any action. The FEC can close a case at any point after reviewing a complaint.  If a violation is found and conciliation cannot be reached, then the FEC can institute a civil court action against a respondent.                                                     

 

 

# # #