Campaign Legal Center, et al. v. FEC (20-0730)
Summary
On July 14, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the court) denied the Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21’s (plaintiffs) motion for reconsideration of an earlier decision declining their standing to sue on informational grounds, instead asking to sue based on organizational injuries.
Background
On March 13, 2020, plaintiffs filed suit alleging the FEC failed to act on two administrative complaints filed in 2015 against Jeb Bush's presidential campaign and Right to Rise Super PAC due to lack of a quorum. Right to Rise intervened, moving to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiffs lacked standing. The court denied this motion in part, finding that plaintiffs had standing on the grounds of a possible informational injury.
Right to Rise moved to reconsider, and in December 2021, the court granted their motion on the grounds that supplemental information and briefing had demonstrated that the alleged lack of information had been disclosed. Because plaintiffs failed to identify further informational injury, the court found that they had not established standing. Plaintiffs moved for reconsideration, seeking a ruling on organizational standing, citing the Commission’s lack of action and failure to disclose documents in a MUR file that may have enabled them to view the Commission’s legal reasoning and further plaintiffs’ role as “regulatory watchdogs.”
Analysis
An organizational injury must establish concrete and demonstrable injury to the organization's activities "constituting more than simply a setback to the organization's abstract social interests." The court noted that plaintiffs have not satisfied the organizational standing test because they did not demonstrate a drain on their resources resulting from a lack of access to documents that are required by statute to be kept confidential. The court concluded that plaintiffs “have therefore shown only a setback to their ‘abstract social interests,’ which is insufficient for Article III standing” and denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider.
Source: FEC Record — July 2022; March 2021; April 2020
Documents
District Court (DC) (20-0730)
Court decisions:
- Memorandum Opinion and Order (07/14/2022)
- Memorandum Opinion (12/30/2021)
- Order (12/30/2021)
- Clerk's Entry of Default (03/05/2021)
- Memorandum Opinion (02/19/2021)
- Order (02/19/2021)
Related documents:
- Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support of their Motion for Reconsideration (02/23/2022)
- Right to Rise Super PAC, Inc.’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (2/16/2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration (02/02/2022)
- Defendant Intervenor Right to Rise Super Pac, Inc.’s Response to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief (05/21/2021)
- Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Opposition to Intervenor-Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (05/21/2021)
- Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Intervenor-Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (05/11/2021)
- Defendant-Intervenor Right to Rise Super Pac Inc.’s Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Reconsideration (05/11/2021)
- Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support of Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant FEC (04/16/2021)
- Right to Rise Super PAC, Inc.’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant FEC (04/09/2021)
- Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment Against FEC (03/26/2021)
- Intervenor-Defendant Right to Rise Super PAC, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Intervenor-Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and/or Certification for Interlocutory Appeal (03/26/2021)
- Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Intervenor-Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and/or Certification for Interlocutory Appeal (03/19/2021)
- Defendant-Intervenor’s Motion for Reconsideration and/or Certification for Interlocutory Appeal (03/05/2021)
- Intervenor-Defendant Right to Rise Super PAC, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Intervenor-Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (07/24/2020)
- Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Intervenor-Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (07/09/2020)
- Proposed Defendant Intervenor Right to Rise Super PAC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Memorandum in Support (06/08/2020)
- Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (03/13/2020)