skip navigation
Here's how you know US flag signifying that this is a United States Federal Government website

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.


Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • FEC Record: Litigation

Wisconsin Family Action v. FEC challenges independent expenditure disclosure requirements (21-1373)

December 17, 2021

On December 2, 2021, Wisconsin Family Action (WFA), a 501(c)(4) non-profit, non-stock corporation, filed suit against the Commission. The complaint alleges that the Commission’s interpretation of Section 30104(c) of the Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act) violates the First Amendment rights of speech, association, and assembly by requiring public disclosure of private associations.


Under the Act and the Commission regulations, “contribution” is defined as a gift of anything of value made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for federal office. An independent expenditure is an expenditure by a person for a communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate and that is not coordinated with a federal candidate or political party.

Pursuant to Section 30104(c)(1), persons other than political committees (“non-political committees”) whose independent expenditures aggregate in excess of $250 in a calendar year must report those expenditures to the Commission, together with the identification of each person who makes contributions in excess of $200 within a calendar year. Section 30104(c)(2) requires that those reports must, among other things, identify each person who made a contribution in excess of $200 for the purpose of furthering an independent expenditure.


WFA’s complaint alleges that the Commission has unlawfully expanded contributor disclosure requirements in its interpretation of Section 30104(c) by requiring disclosure of contributions for nonpolitical and issue advocacy purposes. WFA argues that the disclosure requirements are broad and violate its First Amendment rights to speech and assembly. Based on its mission, WFA further argues that its freedom to associate with its supporters would be significantly damaged if it could not maintain the privacy of their relationship. WFA also asserts that Section 30104(c) is unconstitutional as beyond the power of Congress to enact.

WFA seeks a declaratory judgment that 52 U.S.C. § 30104(c)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional and a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the Commission from enforcing these provisions against them.

Editor’s Note: On May 10, 2022 the parties filed a Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal. Accordingly, the court dismissed the case.


  • Author 
    • Mary Ann Baker
    • Communications Specialist