skip navigation
Here's how you know US flag signifying that this is a United States Federal Government website

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

SSL

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Federal Election Commission | United States of America
  • Press Release

ADR Program Resolves Cases

April 3, 2001

For Immediate Release
April 3, 2001

Contact:

Kelly Huff
Ron Harris
Sharon Snyder
Ian Stirton

 

ADR PROGRAM RESOLVES CASES

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Election Commission is making public an additional case resolved in the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program. This brings to seven the total number of cases released thus far. The program’s goal is to expedite resolution of some enforcement matters, reduce the cost of processing complaints, and enhance overall FEC enforcement. Closed ADR negotiated settlement summaries are available in the FEC’s Press and Public Records offices.

For a case to be considered for ADR treatment, a respondent must express willingness to engage in the ADR process, agree to set aside the statute of limitations while the case is pending in the ADR Office, and agree to participate in bilateral negotiations and, if necessary, mediation.

Bilateral negotiations through ADR are oriented toward reaching an expedient resolution with a mutually agreeable settlement that is both satisfying to the respondent(s) and in compliance with the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). Resolutions reached through direct and, when necessary, mediated negotiations are submitted to the Commissioners for final approval. If a resolution is not reached in bilateral negotiation, the case proceeds to mediation. It should be noted that cases resolved through ADR are not precedential.

 

1. ADR 0009
RESPONDENTS: (a) Rogers for Congress Committee (MI)

(b) Jerry Spitler, Todd Spitler and Scott Spitler (MI)

(c) Brighton Ford Promotion (MI)
SOURCE: MUR 4984 - Michigan Democratic Party (MI)
SUBJECT: Excessive contributions; corporate contributions
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT: (a) $2,550 civil penaltyblockquote

Respondent will attend FEC-sponsored seminar on Campaign Committee Reporting requirements and will meet with Commission staff to review reporting procedures.

<lockquote>

(b) $8,200 civil penalty

(c) Dismiss complaint against respondent.

# # #

Read next:

FEC Cites Committees for Failure to File 12-Day Pre-Primary Financial Report

More press releases »

This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public.

The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.