Democratic National Committee, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al. (25-587)
Summary
On February 28, 2025, the Democratic National Committee, DSCC, and DCCC (collectively, plaintiffs) filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the court) challenging section 7 of Executive Order 14215 as unlawful as applied to the Commission.
Background
On February 18, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14215 (the Executive Order). The Executive Order states that “it shall be the policy of the executive branch to ensure Presidential supervision and control of the entire executive branch” including independent agencies like the Federal Election Commission. Section 7 of the Executive Order states that “the President and the Attorney General’s opinions on questions of law are controlling on all employees in the conduct of their official duties” and prohibits any executive branch employee from “advanc[ing] an interpretation of law as the position of the United States that contravenes the President or the Attorney General’s opinion on a matter of law.”
Plaintiffs contend that the Executive Order purports to provide the president “with the ability to order the FEC to take particular positions on any question of law arising in the Commission’s performance of any of its duties.”
Claims for relief
Plaintiffs ask the court to immediately certify the question of the constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act’s (the Act) provisions vesting the Commission with independent authority to interpret the Act to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit sitting en banc pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30110. Plaintiffs also ask the district court to find that Section 7 of the Executive Order violates the Act because it prohibits the Commissioners from exercising independent legal judgment in carrying out their statutory duties. Plaintiffs further ask that the court enjoin defendants from applying Section 7 of the Executive Order to the Commission or the Commissioners.
Source: FEC Record — March 2025
Documents
District Court (DC)
Court Decisions
- Memorandum Opinion (06/03/2025)
- Order (06/03/2025)
Related Documents
- Brief of Amicus Curiae American Center for Law & Justice in Support of Defendants (06/03/2025)
- Brief of Ellen L. Weintraub as Amicus Curiae (06/03/2025)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae Campaign Legal Center in Support of Plaintiffs (06/03/2025)
- Federal Election Commission's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (04/07/2025)
- Reply Memorandum of Defendants Donald J. Trump and Pamela Bondi in Support of Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (04/07/2025)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae Campaign Legal Center in Support of Plaintiffs (04/03/2025)
- Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae for Campaign Legal Center in Support of Plaintiffs (04/03/2025)
- Plaintiffs' Consolidated Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (04/02/2025)
- Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (04/01/2025)
- Motion of America First Legal Foundation and Texans for Ronny Jackson to Intervene as Defendants (03/27/2025)
- Amended Brief of Ellen L. Weintraub as Amicus Curiae (03/26/2025)
- Amended Motion of Ellen L. Weintraub for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party (03/26/2025)
- Federal Election Commission Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (03/25/2025)
- Federal Election Commission Defendants' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of their Motion to Dismiss (03/21/2025)
- Federal Election Commission Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (03/21/2025)
- Defendants President Donald J. Trump and AG Pamela Bondi's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (03/14/2025)
- Defendants President Donald J. Trump and AG Pamela Bondi's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (03/14/2025)
- Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (03/11/2025)
- Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (03/11/2025)
- Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (02/28/2025)