MUR #6510
MARK STEVEN KIRK, ETALSummary
RESPONDENTS: Kirk, Mark Steven; Considine, Frank; Kirk for Senate; McCracken, Dorothy L.; The Patterson Group; Vail, Robert E.; Van Ness Communications, LLC
COMPLAINANT: Veriolli, Kimberly A.
SUBJECT: Personal use
DISPOSITION: The Commission decided by a vote of 4-0 to: 1. Find no reason to believe that Kirk for Senate and Frank Considine in his official capacity as treasurer, Senator Mark Kirk, Dorothy McCracken, Robert Edward Vail, Jr., The Patterson Group and Van Ness Communicationsviolated 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b) by converting campaign funds to "personal use" based on the theory that McCracken was a "family member" of Sen. Kirk, and that she, through Van Ness and Patterson Group, did not provide bone fide services at fair market value to the campaign. 2. Dismiss the allegations that Kirk for Senate and Frank Considine in his official capacity as treasurer, Senator Mark Kirk, Dorothy McCracken, Robert Edward Vail, The Patterson Group and Van Ness Communications violated 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b) by converting campaign funds to "personal use" through payment for a gym membership. See Heckler v. Cheney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985). 3. Find no reason to believe that Kirk for Senate and Frank Considine in his official capacity as treasurer, Senator Mark Kirk, Dorothy McCracken, Robert Edward Vail, Jr., The Patterson Group and Van Ness Communicationsviolated 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b) by converting campaign funds to "personal use" through payments for travel, meals, transportation, lodging, a dental bill, clothing, and cosmetics. 4. Find no reason to believe that Kirk for Senate and Frank Considine in his official capacity as treasurer violated 2 U.S.C. § 434(b). 5. Approve the Factual and Legal Analyses as recommended in the First General Counsel's Report dated March 8, 2013, subject to edits as previously circulated. 6. Approve the appropriate letters. 7. Close the file.
Disposition
| Disposition | Penalty | Respondent | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No RTB | Considine, Frank |
2
U.S.C.
§439a(b)
2 U.S.C. §434(b) |
|
| Kirk, Mark Steven | 2 U.S.C. §439a(b) | ||
| Kirk for Senate |
2
U.S.C.
§439a(b)
2 U.S.C. §434(b) |
||
| Vail, Robert E. | 2 U.S.C. §439a(b) | ||
| McCracken, Dorothy L. | 2 U.S.C. §439a(b) | ||
| The Patterson Group | 2 U.S.C. §439a(b) | ||
| Van Ness Communications, LLC | 2 U.S.C. §439a(b) |
Documents
Participants
| Relationship | Name |
|---|---|
| Primary respondent | Kirk, Mark Steven |
| Previous respondent | Considine, Frank |
| Kirk for Senate | |
| McCracken, Dorothy L. | |
| The Patterson Group | |
| Vail, Robert E. | |
| Van Ness Communications, LLC | |
| Complainant | Veriolli, Kimberly A. |
| Respondent's counsel | McGinley, William J., Esq. |