AO 2004-30
Citizens UnitedSummary
Documentary and broadcast ads do not qualify for media exception from definition of electioneering communication.
Documents
Final opinion September 10, 2004
Date | Name | Document type |
---|---|---|
09/10/2004 | AO 2004-30 | Final Opinion |
09/09/2004 | Concurring Opinion (Chairman Smith) | Commissioner Statements |
09/09/2004 | Vote | Votes |
09/08/2004 | Comment on OGC Draft by Citizens United | Comments and Ex parte Communications |
09/02/2004 | Draft AO (OGC), Agenda Document 04-81 | Draft Documents |
08/13/2004 | Comment on AOR by Democracy 21, Campaign Legal Center, Center for Responsive Politics | Comments and Ex parte Communications |
07/08/2004 | Request by Citizens United | AO Request, Supplemental Material, and Extensions of Time |
Entities
Role | Name | Type |
---|---|---|
Requestor | Citizens United | Corporation (including LLCs electing corporate status) |
Counsel/Representative | Mr. Michael Boos Esq. | Individual |
Commenter | Citizens United | Corporation (including LLCs electing corporate status) |
Commenter | Mr. Michael Boos Esq. | Individual |
Commenter | Campaign Legal Center | Research/Public Interest/Educational Institution |
Commenter | Mr. J. Gerald Hebert Esq. | Individual |
Commenter | Democracy 21 | Research/Public Interest/Educational Institution |
Commenter | Mr. Fred Wertheimer | Individual |
Commenter | Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry LLP | Law Firm |
Commenter | Mr. Donald J. Simon Esq. | Individual |
Commenter | Center for Responsive Politics | Research/Public Interest/Educational Institution |
Commenter | Mr. Lawrence M. Noble Esq. | Individual |
Commenter | Mr. Trevor Potter | Individual |