| Case | Date issued | Summary | This opinion is cited by these later opinions |
|---|---|---|---|
|
02/10/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
02/26/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
07/12/1976
|
This entry consists of two documents, Part A and Part B. Part A is an Advisory Opinion to Abourezk concerning the transfer of
excess campaign funds into an office account. Part B is an Opinion of Counsel issued to the Kildee for Congress Committee and
not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
10/22/1976
|
Corporation's publication of news stories related to its separate segregated fund.
|
||
|
09/01/1976
|
No opinion issued due to pendency of proposed regulations. The request concerns a candidate's use of incorporated fire
department's property.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
02/25/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
08/03/1976
|
Reporting of unsolicited contributions.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
02/26/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
09/01/1976
|
No opinion issued due to pendency of proposed regulations.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
02/27/1976
|
No opinion issued because question presented was made moot by the Supreme Court's decision in Buckley v Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
02/26/1976
|
No opinion issued because question presented was made moot by the Supreme Court's decision in Buckley v Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
02/23/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
Withdrawn
|
Withdrawn.
|
||
|
02/23/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
This advisory opinion is not cited by other advisory opinions
|
|
|
09/14/1976
|
Payment for tabulating Congressman's questionnaires.
|
||
|
03/02/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
||
|
03/12/1976
|
This response is an Opinion of Counsel, not an opinion issued by the Commission, and does not constitute an Advisory Opinion.
|
||
|
02/03/1976
|
Partly superseded; see Notice 1976-58, 41 FR 46416 (Oct. 20, 1976). Acceptance of maximum individual contributions by a
non-major political party.
|
||
|
06/22/1976
|
No opinion issued due to pendency of proposed regulations.
|
||
|
08/26/1976
|
No opinion issued because requestor failed to provide additional information as requested by the Commission.
|