FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION FY 2001 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUESTPursuant to our authority as a concurrent submission agency, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) is seeking a FY 2001 Supplemental Appropriation request for $3 million dollars in no-year funds (i.e., funds that would be available beyond September 30, 2001) and 3 FTE staff (6 staff for 50% of FY 2001). This proposal for supplemental funding in FY 2001 would provide for an enhancement of the FEC Office of Election Administration (OEA) mission. It is in response to the numerous calls for reform of election administration. This enhanced support for OEA is sought to better assist state and local election administrators who are responsible for administering federal elections to develop operational election administration opeerational and management standards. There has been considerable discussion of the need for federal assistance to the state and local election administrators responsible for acquiring, installing, operating and maintaining the nations electoral machinery. The 2000 presidential election raised issues with regard to both the adequacy of the voting machines and the standards, or lack thereof, used by local election officials, who in some cases are elected political officials and are not necessarily trained election administrators. FEC RoleOEA was created under 2 U.S.C. § 438(a)(10), which mandates that the Federal Election Commission serve as a national clearinghouse with respect to the administration of federal elections. The FEC has staffed OEA with recognized election experts who have extensive experience in election administration. Moreover, the FECs Commissioners are themselves well-versed in a variety of issues that confront election administrators. Prior to their service at the FEC, several Commissioners had substantial extensivexperience in election administration and other election issues, including selecting and testing voting equipment for both urban and rural areas, supervising the resolution of contested Congressional elections, and practicing election law in the area of recounts. Federal initiatives in improving election administration should be located at the FEC to leverage this expertise and to build on existing relationships with state and local election officials. This is a critical advantage if rapid action is desired and if meaningful assistance to state and local officials is to be provided for future elections. The proposal also avoids creating any new, duplicative bureaucracy. The OEA staff serves as an objective moderator, brokering the interests of issue groups such as the disabled community with the interests of election officials and political office holders. They have experience working with the vendors of voting machines as well as with the election officials and state officers responsible for acquiring and operating voting machinery. OEA has worked with many groups of election officials and has chaired numerous meetings with election administrators to address a variety of issues, including polling place accessibility, Internet voting, and the Voting System Standards. OEA has participated in the implementation of federal initiatives in election administration, such as the Polling Place Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act and the National Voter Registration Act ("Motor Voter"), and has been engaged in a multiyear project to revise voluntary Voting Systems Standards (VSS), which represent technical standards for voting equipment. As a result of these efforts, OEA has gained the confidence of the election community by working closely with local and state officials on these collaborative efforts. FEC ProposalAn objective, comprehensive approach is the best solution to the current issues regarding in administering federal elections. The FEC proposal is designed to address both short-term and long-term issues. While an immediate response might be to provide federal funds to acquire new voting machinery, thatsuch an approach doewould not address the establishment of operational and management standards for the testing and performance measurement of voting equipment, acquisition procedures for voting systems, system security practices, and ballot preparation and design. The FEC proposal is designed to accomplish five objectives:
The most efficient way to meet these objectives to improve the nations voting systems is to build upon the work already accomplished by the FECs OEA. Ongoing funding will be required in future years to ensure that all aspects of the VSS are kept up-to-date. FY 2001 Supplemental ProposalThis supplemental proposal requests $3.0 million in no-year funds. Work would begin on enhancing the VSS (beyond the update of the VSS funded by existing FY 2001 funds) and on developing the managementoperational standards in FY 2001. The gathering of information regarding the needs and resource requirements of state and local election officials, and the development of the proposals for research would occur in FY 2001. In addition to any supplemental funds remaining after FY 2001, the FY 2002 and later Budget Requests would contain funds for continuing work on the election management operational standards and for a comprehensive educational and information outreach program to widely disseminate the enhanced VSS, the managementoperational standards, and other OEA elections administration efforts. Finally, if Congress determines to enact a grant program to provide federal financial assistance to state and local election officials, the OEA would administer the grant program. The $3.0 million would be spent as follows:
The requested travel and printing in FY 2002 and future years would be used to disseminate the new standards to state and local election officials through a series of workshops starting in FY 2002. The OEA anticipates holding a conference in FY 2002 to introduce the updated VSS to election officials. FY 2001 VSS Projects and FY 2002 FundingThe projects proposed above are in addition to the current VSS updates that OEA plans to complete by December 2001. Budgeted FY 2001 funds will be used to enhance the current VSS and to hold Advisory Panel meetings on the VSS updates, as well as to consult with elections officials in initiating the development of management operational standards. In FY 2002, the OEA will hold a conference to introduce the revised VSS to the election administration community. When the operational and management standards are completed, FY 2002 funds will be used to undertake a large scale and comprehensive educational outreach program to widely and aggressively disseminate the new standards. In sum, the proposed course of action is as follows: complete VSS updates with current FY 2001 funds; use the FY 2001 Supplemental (no-year funds) to expand VSS technical standards and develop management andoperational standards, undertake an assessment of elections administration resources and a census of current elections systems, and design grant program criteria; with the FY 2001 Supplemental (no-year funds); complete the management operational standards and initiate comprehensive educational and dissemination program in FY 2002 (with some of the no-year FY 2001 funds and the funds requested in the Full FY 2002 Budget); and implement any enacted grant program in FY 2002 and future fiscal years.
|
ELECTIONS
ADMINISTRATION FY 2001-2
|
FY 2001 |
FTE |
FY 2002 |
FTE |
TOTAL |
|
Existing OEA Funds FY 2001 |
||||||
Complete VSS Standards |
$ 200,000 | 0 | $ - | 0 | $ 200,000 | |
Hold VSS Advisory Panel Meetings/Additional Standards |
$ 60,000 | 0 | $ - | 0 | $ 60,000 | |
FY 2001 Existing Totals |
$ 260,000 | $ - | $ 260,000 | |||
Develop Operations Standards/Expand VSS |
||||||
Research Contracts--VSS and Operations Standards |
$ 1,100,000 | 0 | $ 500,000 | 0 | $ 1,600,000 | |
Education Program-Disseminate Standards |
$ - | $ 500,000 | $ 500,000 | |||
Subtotal Operations Standards/VSS |
$ 1,100,000 | $ 1,000,000 | $ 2,100,000 | |||
Assess Elections Administration Resources |
||||||
Consult with Elections Administrators |
$ 150,000 | 0 | $ - | 0 | $ 150,000 | |
Conduct Assessment of EA Resources and Needs |
$ 300,000 | 0 | $ - | 0 | $ 300,000 | |
Subtotal Resource Assessment |
$ 450,000 | $ - | $ 450,000 | |||
Update OEA Contracts on Elections Admin. |
||||||
Research Contracts |
$ 300,000 | 0 | $ 300,000 | 0 | $ 600,000 | |
Publish/Disseminate Results |
$ - | $ 450,000 | $ 450,000 | |||
Subtotal OEA Updates |
$ 300,000 | $ 750,000 | $ 1,050,000 | |||
Develop Grant Program |
||||||
Census of Voting Systems |
$ 400,000 | 0 | $ - | 0 | $ 400,000 | |
Design Grant Program Criteria |
$ 100,000 | 0 | $ - | 0 | $ 100,000 | |
Subtotal Grant Program Development |
$ 500,000 | $ - | $ 500,000 | |||
Administer Research and Grant Programs |
||||||
Personnel |
$ 262,000 | 3 | $ 552,000 | 6 | $ 814,000 | |
Travel |
$ 100,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 140,000 | |||
Postage |
$ 25,000 | $ 25,000 | $ 50,000 | |||
Printing |
$ 125,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 165,000 | |||
Conference Expenses/Supplies |
$ 50,000 | $ 25,000 | $ 75,000 | |||
Rent |
$ 25,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 125,000 | |||
Equipment |
$ 63,000 | $ 10,000 | $ 73,000 | |||
Administer Programs Totals |
$ 650,000 | 3 | $ 792,000 | 6 | $ 1,442,000 | |
FY 2001 SUPPLEMENTAL |
$ 3,000,000 | 3 | $ - | $ 3,000,000 | ||
FY 2001 TOTALS |
$ 3,260,000 | 3 | $ - | $ 3,260,000 | ||
FY 2002 BUDGET |
$ - | $ 2,542,000 | 6 | $ 2,542,000 | ||
FY 2002 TOTALS |
$ - | $ 2,542,000 | 6 | $ 2,542,000 |