Skip Navigation
Federal Election Commission, United States of America (logo). Link to FEC Home Page
Federal Election Commission
FEC Search



FEC Record: Litigation

Sign-up to receive an e-mail notification when a new issue of the Record is posted. Sign-up to receive an email notification when new articles are posted.

Latest Articles:

Pursuing America's Greatness v. FEC (Appeals Court)
(Posted 08/09/2016; By Myles Martin)

On August 2, 2016, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the district court’s denial of Pursuing America's Greatness's (PAG) request for a preliminary injunction against the application of a Commission regulation, 11 CFR 102.14(a), to PAG’s websites and social media pages. Read more...

Pillar of Law Institute, et al. v. FEC (District Court)
(Posted 08/02/2016; By Zainab Smith)

On July 22, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming entered a Consent Order and Judgment whereby the Commission agreed not to enforce the ban on corporate contributions against the Pillar of Law Institute ("Pillar") and two unnamed plaintiffs (collectively, "Plaintiffs") with respect to contributions to convention delegates. Read more...

CREW v. FEC (16-1088) (New)
(Posted 06/16/2016; By Zainab Smith)

On June 10, 2016, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and its Executive Director, Noah Bookbinder, (collectively, "CREW") filed suit against the Commission in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. CREW alleges that the Commission's dismissal of its administrative complaint (Matter Under Review (MUR) 6661) against Robert E. Murray; Murray Energy Corporation; Murray Energy Corporation PAC and Michael G. Ruble, in his official capacity as treasurer, (collectively, "Respondents") was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion and contrary to law. Read more...

Holmes, et al. v. FEC (Appeals Court)
(Posted 04/29/2016; By Zainab Smith)

Plaintiffs Laura Holmes and Paul Jost claim that the per-election limits on individual contributions to candidates violate the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to certify the constitutional questions to the en banc court of appeals and granted the FEC's motion for summary judgment. On April 26, 2016, the court of appeals affirmed the district court's decision not to certify the Fifth Amendment question, but reversed the court's decision not to certify the First Amendment question and to grant summary judgment to the Commission on plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims. Read more...

Campaign Legal Center, et al. v. FEC (New)
(Posted 04/29/2016; By Myles Martin)

On April 22, 2016, Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 (plaintiffs) filed suit against the Commission in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs are challenging the Commission's dismissal of five administrative complaints as arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law. The complaints alleged that several entities and individuals violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122, which prohibits making contributions in the name of another, and thereby evaded certain disclosure provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act). Read more...






FEC Record Home Page
Latest Articles by Category:
Archive (1977-Present):



The FEC Record is produced by the Information Division, Office of Communications. Toll free 800-424-9530; Local 202-694-1100; Email Greg Scott, Assistant Staff Director, Information Division; George Smaragdis, Deputy Assistant Staff Director, Publications; Dorothy Yeager, Sr. Communications Specialist