Federal Election Commission, United States of America (logo). Link to FEC Home Page
Federal Election Commission

Disclosure Data Weblog

We're preparing to release a new summary file focusing on the 2009-2010 financial activity of PACs and parties, and we have some questions we'd like your help with.  

There are lots of different kinds of groups that must file regular or occasional financial reports with us.  While the two biggest categories of those (not including campaigns themselves) are PACs and party committees, others include people and/or groups making independent expenditures, groups making electioneering communications (broadcast ads close to an election that refer to a federal candidate), groups making internal communications to their own members advocating the election of federal candidates and a few other smaller sets.

The first question is, when we prepare files with financial summaries for committees should we throw all of these into the same set (with fields that distinguish among them) or is it better to create different files for different subsets?  We're not talking about huge numbers of records here - the total for all non-candidate filers so far in 2009 is about 6,600 - and many of the groups that are not PACs or parties may have no financial activity since their reporting requirements are based on their specific actions and usually tied to campaign seasons.

If you have a preference, or an idea about how we should organize these files, post a comment.

 

Thanks

Comments:

One file is better than multiple files. The FTP files are helpful, but they only list FEC ID numbers, never the committee name. If the .csv export files had committee names, and field separators, the files would be more easily searchable. I realize Microsoft Access is the best program for viewing these files, but I use a Mac - and no Access available. Thank you for the open forum and blog! Much appreciated!

Posted by Justin on November 02, 2009 at 01:42 PM EST #

I agree with Justin. For those of us who like to grab this financial data for our own analysis, it is much more convenient if it is all in one place - ie. one file. Thanks for asking!

Posted by Construction Industry on December 16, 2009 at 05:41 PM EST #

I think Justin as hit the nail on the head

Posted by website optimisation on March 23, 2010 at 10:28 AM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: Allowed